Last year I got to thinking about the many things that I
should be thankful for, but never have, mostly because they have kinda been off
my – and most folks’ – radar. More
macro-level social elements that have helped to enable me and my family to have
a life that we are indeed very thankful for.
So I did a blawg
post, and since I - not surprisingly
– got carried away, I did another
one. Here we are another year hence
and Thanksgiving looms large (especially with a coast-to-coast storm and a
never-before-heard-of “bomb cyclone”
crashing into the West, which sounds good!).
Not surprisingly, since we were just in DC, a few of them are a bit
history-intensive.
Newspapers
It’s no secret that the news industry is hurting. And “hurting” may be a euphemism. Major city papers around the country are a
pamphlet of what they once were, and it’s clear from the plethora of ads for
hearing aids, ED, adult diapers and living facilities that their target market
won’t even be around much longer. And
yes, Ashley and I still rely on someone driving around in a car, burning
gasoline throughout the wee hours of the morning to toss a physical paper onto
our porch. Then we put it in the recycling bin with the other mostly-ridiculous
social dinosaur of US mail and hope that the Chinese will be able to recycle it
for us.
But we do read the paper.
And it’s great. The Salt Lake Tribune – as it’s banner proudly proclaims
– been around since 1871 and literally is an institution in the state. Paul Huntsman (brother of former UT governor
and presidential candidate, and recent candidate for guv again Jon Huntsman)
was apparently inspired by Jeff Bezos who bought the Washington Post, but even
families’ mountains of money aren’t enough to plug the dike, because recently
the Trib went to a nonprofit model; the first “legacy” paper in the country to
do so. We’ll see how it goes.
In DC we went to the soon-to-be-shuttered Newseum, which was
incredible, and getting a historical perspective of how important newspapers
have been throughout our country’s history indeed gave a lot of credence to the
famous Thomas Jefferson quote: “Were it
left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or
newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the
latter.”
Paul Revere wasn't only a good horseman with a lantern, he was also a muckraker! |
and speaking of muckrakers:
There's no doubt that papers have had a big effect on history:
The movie "The Post" is a great version of this story that stars Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks |
Now of course, with 24 hour
news channels and a gazillion “news” outlets on the interwebs that have a clear
social/political bias (for sure, bias has always existed, but it’s gotten
turbocharged over the last 20 years) it has created a society that tends to
clique together into echo chambers, but I’m pretty convinced that most
reporters, papers, and news agencies are committed to honesty and integrity in
their reporting, with newspapers perhaps being the last holdouts.
The Daily Show
Speaking of biased news, the Daily Show has been a bit of an
institution for liberals looking for someone to skewer…pretty much everyone for
over 20 years. To be sure, the Daily
Show just another in a long litany of TV political satire: the Smothers Brothers show
got heavily censored and eventually cancelled for it’s unceasing criticism of
the Vietnam War and the president:
and the classic “Weekend Update” on Saturday
Night Live nearly defined satire news culture in the 70’s:
the actual sign that was used on SNL |
and all the while
the likes of Carson, Leno, and Letterman delighted legions of fans with their
nightly opening monologues. But it
seemed like the Daily Show turned up the volume a notch with a creative,
hilarious, and bold cadre of correspondents that in turn have gone on to
successful careers doing more of the same themselves. And while the likes of Carson et al seemed to
be pretty much performing for laughs, Jon Stewart infused the (actual) fake
news with a real passion that was reflected in his stories and the crew around
him, and as such he and they seemed to transcend the blurry line between
comedy, news, and social commentary.
Trevor Noah had hugemungous shoes to fill, and Ashley and I feel like
he’s done a great job at retaining the Stewart Spirit.
Here are some other perspectives of Jon Stewart at his retirement:
Michael Steele was a particular target of Jon Stewart's |
as was Glenn Beck. |
Steven Spielberg
On the plane the other day I watched “Jaws” for the first
time in….a longggg time (I remember reading the book when I was 10). It’s still a great movie. I was surprised at the end to see that it was
a Steven Spielberg movie. I don’t really
know much about him as a person, nor really what he actually “does” (or, for
that matter, any directors/producers do) but he’s been an integral part in a
big handful of pics that have almost defined pop culture of those eras. In addition to Jaws he did the iconic full-on
entertainment ET, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Goonies and
Gremlins, the Jurassic Park series, Back To The Future, Poltergeist, and Catch
Me If You Can, yet in between he made the really profound Schindler’s List,
Saving Private Ryan, Lincoln, Flags of Our Fathers, and of course many others
(32 total). One ancient classic that is
a favorite of Brother Paul and I that I just found out is a Spielberg creation: Duel. Making entertaining movies isn’t necessarily
a paramount ingredient of our existence, but the litany of movies that he’s
done have added a fair bit to our social web.
Daniel Kahneman (and
Amos Taversky)
Some years ago I saw a guy named Jonah Lehrer being
interviewed on a tour for his new book “How We Decide”, which I found to be
pretty intriguing since - as Ashley
found in later research – we make something like 35,000 decisions a day, and
making more “right” decisions out of those 35k might make for a better life. It was a good book (tho Lehrer was later
disgraced by plagiarizing – of all people – Bob Dylan in a subsequent book) and
put me onto a bit of a binge of reading similar books, including Malcolm
Gladwell’s “Blink”,
another unspellable guy’s “Flow”,
and “Deep
Survival (who lives, who dies, and why)”
Basically, I wanted to try to get a handle on my own decision making so
that I wouldn’t make dumb decisions.
I realized that a common name that kept coming up in those
books was Daniel Kahneman. Kahneman had
won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 2003 for proving a very simple
thesis: people do not act
rationally. Almost all economic models
made the fundamental assumption that humans are rational and will always act in
ways that will enhance their position.
However, anyone with a pulse or knows someone who has one knows that
this isn’t true. Kahnemann and his
deceased buddy Amos Taversky basically just proved that and put it into terms
that pompous economists apparently could understand and accept.
But he didn’t stop there.
Basically, the Father of Behavorial Economics decided to put his life’s
work into a tome for non-economists (and non-psychologists) called “Thinking,
Fast and Slow” that puts our rational and irrational behaviors under a
microscope and explains them very effectively, and kind of introduced the
concept of “heuristics”
(rules of thumb, based on previous experience, for right or wrong) to many
people. For my little world, Ian
McCammon took the concept into the decision-centric backcountry ski/avalanche
world (“do I ski this slope or not? Will
it avalanche or not?” and pretty
much changed the avalanche education world.
“Thinking, Fast and Slow” is a bit of a project, but I think
– and many other folks who are far smarter than me would agree – that it’s the
most important book ever.
I of course got carried away on this "thankfullness" concept and have a coupla more, for another post later this weekend.....